…if you’re relying on the Space Launch System (SLS) and the Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle (MPCV) to forge a path into the solar system. The NASA Inspector General released this report on development problems with the MPCV. While the report goes out of its way to say that everyone is doing the best they can under the circumstances, the low funding level of the program is forcing an incremental test program that is introducing a large amount of risk to the development. The report documents the delays in several key program tests, including the 4-year delay of the crew escape system test and the fact that the first flight has been delayed to beyond the expected life of the space station. Oh, and the heat shield may crack due to exposure to deep space. Another issue raised is the reliance on other systems that the MPCV has no control over, such as SLS, the ground system development to support SLS, and the European Space Agency, who’s on the hook for at least one service module for the MPCV.
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
Archives
- November 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
Categories
- Administrative
- Amateur Astronomy
- Amateur Radio/Space
- Asteroids
- Budget
- Business Plans
- Cool Pictures
- Entertainment
- Fanciful
- History
- Humans to Anywhere
- Humans to Mars
- Launch
- Mars
- Media Commentary
- Mission Status
- Moon
- My Past
- Near Earth Objects
- New Space
- Political
- Space Resources
- Space Weather
- SpaceX
- Technical
- Uncategorized
- Volunteer Work
Meta
I believe I’ve recently read that the Orion alone is getting by with $1B/yr (poor thing).
Let’s see, $1B÷$80M = 12.5 and $1B÷$125M = 8 (the $×M numbers are the price range for a Falcon Heavy). The up mass for the FH is 53mT vs the SLS Block 1 at 105mT.
So, it would take 4 FH’s to lift the same as 2 SLS’s, but the FH’s needed would cost only, at the higher pricing, ½ a year’s development cost ($½B) of the Orion. And you can bet your bottom dollar (as they used to say) the SLS per launch cost is a lot more than one year’s development cost for Orion.
Dear Congress: Please explain to me why supporting SLS is more cost effective for the taxpayers than supporting Commercial Cargo/Crew!